On a Sunday afternoon in the year 1996, a lone gunman using semi-automatic rifles took the lives of 35 people in the Australian tourist town of Port Arthur.
That national tragedy nearly a generation ago, which ushered in some of the strictest firearm regulations in the world, can seem like a bygone age for many Australians.
However, the Bondi Beach attack this past Sunday, which resulted in 15 fatalities, has revived the ghosts of the 1996 shootings.
A recent report revealed that there are now over four million privately-owned firearms across the country – a figure that is roughly two times the amount from the late 1990s.
This equates to approximately a weapon for each small group of people.
While Queensland has the highest number of legal firearms, followed by NSW and the state of Victoria, it is Tasmania and the NT that have the most guns per person.
The data also contradicts the widespread belief that guns are mainly owned by rural residents.
Guns are common in metropolitan and suburban areas, with a sizable percentage located in urban hubs.
Critically, there are now firearms concentrated among fewer owners, with the typical gun owner possessing more than four firearms.
Weapons legislation in Australia are not uniform across the country, with a disparate implementation of rules across states and territories.
Typically, to secure a gun licence, an individual must be over 18, deemed a "responsible individual", pass a safety program, and provide a "legitimate need" for ownership.
The permitted justifications include hunting or culling, marksmanship, certain occupational requirements, and for collections.
However, significant gaps remain. For instance, minors in some jurisdictions can have access to a firearm from as young as 10 or 12 years old.
Following the Port Arthur massacre, a comprehensive reform of national gun laws was enacted, leading to a voluntary hand-in of over 650,000 firearms.
Rapid-fire weapons were banned, and security screenings alongside mandatory cooling-off periods for sales were introduced.
A key tenet of these reforms was the removal of "personal protection" as a acceptable grounds for gun ownership.
In the immediate aftermath the Bondi shooting, political leaders were unequivocal about the need to strengthen gun laws.
A country-wide firearm surrender program was announced, marking the largest such effort since 1996.
Other suggested measures now under consideration include:
There are also calls for ongoing evaluations of existing licence holders, acknowledging that "situations evolve" over time.
These reform efforts have sparked debate from some quarters.
Pro-gun advocates contend that imposing caps would not have stopped an attack driven by radicalisation.
They suggest that resources would be better spent addressing root causes rather than restricting lawful owners for the great bulk of responsible owners.
Furthermore, a long-promised reform from 1996 – a national firearms register – remains unfinished, though it has now been listed as a urgent task.
For reformers, the Bondi attack is a stark warning that policies must evolve with technological advances.
They argue that modernisation is needed to "remain effective" and prevent future tragedies.
While mass shootings remain uncommon in Australia compared to some nations, the risk persists, and the challenge of firearms circulating illegally – through black markets – continues to pose a problem.
As one advocate noted, "It is unfortunate that it requires such a tragedy to prompt action and pay heed."
A tech enthusiast and digital strategist with over a decade of experience in software development and emerging technologies.