Officials in the city have taken into custody thirteen people on suspicion of involuntary manslaughter related to last week’s devastating fire, amidst increasing public outcry over the detentions of citizens demanding accountability.
Emergency services persisted in combing through the seven-building complex of the Wang Fuk Court estate in Tai Po on Monday, following the most fatal blaze in seven and a half decades. The death toll reached 151 and is expected to rise higher as the operation goes on. About 40 people are currently unaccounted for.
The estate, home to almost five thousand people, had been in the midst of major refurbishment that have been associated with the origin of the blaze. In the aftermath, anger has grown over reported previous safety breaches by the contractor working at the site and poor oversight of standards, spurred on by revelations that residents had been voicing concerns over the work for a year.
On the afternoon of Monday, authorities said the anti-graft agency had detained 13 people over the disaster so far, including the executives and an engineering consultant of a construction company, and had “immediately begun a thorough probe along the lines of involuntary manslaughter”.
A top administrator stated that 7 of twenty tested specimens of the mesh netting used around the buildings did not meet fire-retardant standards. Preliminary checks had found materials were compliant, but the official said the less expensive, noncompliant netting had been put in areas difficult to access in order to evade detection, describing it as a “shameful act”.
“They just wanted to make money at the expense of people’s lives,” he said.
As accusations of safety lapses grow, alongside reports that government authorities had issued several apparently ignored cautions, the public have asked why no government figures have yet faced consequences. Conversely, two civilians were allegedly taken into custody by national security police.
One individual, identified as a Hong Kong student, was arrested over an internet appeal that made “four demands” for assured assistance for the affected families and responsibility for those at to blame, including any negligent or responsible public servants.
Local media said the individual was arrested for “inciting disaffection”. Law enforcement did not confirm the arrest, saying only that they “will take actions according to the situation and in accordance with the law”.
News outlets also reported the detention of a ex-local representative.
Asked about the detentions, the secretary of security said there had been “inaccurate comments online” that were intended to threaten public security. “Therefore, we must take necessary steps, including law enforcement measures,” the official told a media briefing. “Specifics of the operation cannot be disclosed as they involve state security.”
On Hong Kong social media, people criticised the arrests of civilians. “National security must be given precedence even if the dead are still trapped in the building,” said one.
Some commenters drew comparisons to mainland China. “There, these crimes are termed ‘picking quarrels and provoking trouble’,” said one commenter. “It’s usually met with heavy sentences. Social order trumps everything.”
Another said: “Now that we are aligning with mainland China’s methods, by targeting the person who raises the question, no one will venture to question, and thus the city's administration will have no issues.”
The arrests followed advisories by security officials that they would take action against anyone deemed to be exploiting the tragedy to incite “hostile” feelings.
Before the arrests, authorities had already begun showing increased vigilance to the public reaction. Since the quelling of earlier unrest, public assemblies have been tightly controlled. In the immediate aftermath, community volunteers quickly organized aid operations, with many individuals using cars and transit to deliver mountains of clothes, food and other essentials for the survivors.
Nevertheless, by nightfall, armed police were monitoring the vicinity, and public authorities eventually assumed control from the community coordinators.
The appeal over which the individual was reportedly detained was initiated late on Friday. Its “four demands” echoed the language of previous campaigns but did not advocate systemic reform.
The student told media that he was only “proposing very basic demands”.
“Should these suggestions are deemed seditious or ‘transgressive’, then I feel I can’t predict the outcomes of anything any more, and I can only do what I sincerely think is correct,” he said.
A tech enthusiast and digital strategist with over a decade of experience in software development and emerging technologies.